get_user_by_id
Retrieve user details by providing their unique user ID.
Instructions
Fetches a user by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Retrieve user details by providing their unique user ID.
Fetches a user by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. It only states 'Fetches a user by ID' without indicating read-only nature, return structure, or any side effects. Output schema exists but is not referenced.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no waste, but it is under-specified for the tool's role. Conciseness is good, but at the cost of missing critical details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity and the presence of an output schema, the description still lacks sufficient context about what is returned or how the user ID is expected to be formatted. Does not stand alone for effective agent use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, leaving the description to explain parameters. The description merely repeats the parameter name's implication ('by ID'), adding no format, constraints, or examples.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Fetches' and resource 'user' with method 'by ID'. It distinguishes from siblings like get_user_by_screen_name by specifying the lookup key, but does not explicitly differentiate from get_user or get_user_id.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_user_by_screen_name or get_user. No context about prerequisites or typical use cases.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/strobekiss/x-mcp-lite'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server