favorite_tweet
Favorites a tweet given its ID. Use this to like a tweet on Twitter.
Instructions
Favorites a tweet.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tweet_id | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Favorites a tweet given its ID. Use this to like a tweet on Twitter.
Favorites a tweet.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tweet_id | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as idempotency, authentication needs, or side effects like duplicate favoriting.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single sentence that is concise, though it could benefit from structured formatting for clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Minimally adequate for a simple action, but lacks details on behavior and return value, though an output schema exists.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds no meaning beyond the input schema; the single parameter 'tweet_id' is undefined and schema description coverage is 0%.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Favorites a tweet' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from siblings like 'unfavorite_tweet' and 'bookmark_tweet'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., bookmark_tweet, unfavorite_tweet) or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/strobekiss/x-mcp-lite'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server