InfraNode

Points of Interest

pois

Read-onlyIdempotent

Get points of interest in a German city, filtered by type (e.g., hospital, school, pharmacy, restaurant, police, kindergarten). Uses OpenStreetMap data.

Instructions

Get points of interest in a German city, filtered by type.

Sourced from OpenStreetMap. Read-only.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "slug": "<slug>",
      "type": "<type>"
    },
    "name": "pois"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`slug`	Yes	City slug from the list_cities tool, e.g. 'berlin' or 'hamburg'.
`type`	Yes	POI type from the API allowlist, one of: hospital, school, pharmacy, restaurant, police, kindergarten.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`data`	Yes
`meta`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed13 schema fields changedv1.0.1Jul 6, 2026
- removedInput schema / properties / slug / title
```
Removed value: -"Slug"
```
- removedInput schema / properties / type / title
```
Removed value: -"Type"
```
- removedInput schema / title
```
Removed value: -"poisArguments"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / description
```
Removed value: -"Envelope-Metadaten: Quelle, Status, Cache, Lizenz und Attribution.\n\nZusatzfelder (z.B. ``covered_cities``, ``radius_m`` bei partieller Abdeckung)\nbleiben dank ``extra=\"allow\"`` erhalten."
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / attribution / title
```
Removed value: -"Attribution"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / cache_status / title
```
Removed value: -"Cache Status"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / correlation_id / title
```
Removed value: -"Correlation Id"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / license / title
```
Removed value: -"License"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / source / title
```
Removed value: -"Source"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / source_status / title
```
Removed value: -"Source Status"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / title
```
Removed value: -"ToolMeta"
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / data / title
```
Removed value: -"Data"
```
- removedOutput schema / title
```
Removed value: -"ToolEnvelope"
```

Changed3 schema fields changedJun 25, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / slug / description

Added value: +"City slug from the list_cities tool, e.g. 'berlin' or 'hamburg'."

addedInput schema / properties / type / description

Added value: +"POI type from the API allowlist, one of: hospital, school, pharmacy, restaurant, police, kindergarten."

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$defs": {
+    "ToolMeta": {
+      "additionalProperties": true,
+      "description": "Envelope-Metadaten: Quelle, Status, Cache, Lizenz und Attribution.\n\nZusatzfelder (z.B. ``covered_cities``, ``radius_m`` bei partieller Abdeckung)\nbleiben dank ``extra=\"allow\"`` erhalten.",
+      "properties": {
+        "attribution": {
+          "title": "Attribution",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "cache_status": {
+          "title": "Cache Status",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "correlation_id": {
+          "title": "Correlation Id",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "license": {
+          "title": "License",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "source": {
+          "title": "Source",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "source_status": {
+          "title": "Source Status",
+          "type": "string"
+        }
+      },
+      "title": "ToolMeta",
+      "type": "object"
+    }
+  },
+  "properties": {
+    "data": {
+      "title": "Data"
+    },
+    "meta": {
+      "$ref": "#/$defs/ToolMeta"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "data",
+    "meta"
+  ],
+  "title": "ToolEnvelope",
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedv1.0.0Jun 18, 2026

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint. The description adds context about data sourcing from OpenStreetMap, which is not covered by annotations. No contradictions found.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences: first states the core purpose, second adds essential context (source and read-only). No filler, front-loaded, every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema, the description does not need to explain return values. It covers purpose, geographic scope (German city), filter (type), and data source. Lack of pagination or result limit details is acceptable for read-only tools with annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are well-documented in the schema. The description merely repeats 'filtered by type' without adding new meaning beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action ('Get'), resource ('points of interest'), and key filters ('in a German city', 'filtered by type'). It also mentions the data source (OpenStreetMap) and read-only nature, distinguishing it from sibling tools like list_cities or get_city.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While the purpose is clear, the description lacks information about prerequisites, exclusions, or comparisons with siblings like get_city_overview or sources.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server