InfraNode

List Cities

list_cities

Read-onlyIdempotent

Discover all German cities covered by InfraNode with their slug, federal state, population, and coverage. Call this first to get valid city slugs for subsequent city-specific queries.

Instructions

List all covered cities (slug, federal state, population, coverage).

Takes no arguments. Call this first to discover valid city slugs before invoking any city-scoped tool. Read-only.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "list_cities"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`data`	Yes
`meta`	Yes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed11 schema fields changedv1.0.1Jul 6, 2026
- removedInput schema / title
```
Removed value: -"list_citiesArguments"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / description
```
Removed value: -"Envelope-Metadaten: Quelle, Status, Cache, Lizenz und Attribution.\n\nZusatzfelder (z.B. ``covered_cities``, ``radius_m`` bei partieller Abdeckung)\nbleiben dank ``extra=\"allow\"`` erhalten."
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / attribution / title
```
Removed value: -"Attribution"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / cache_status / title
```
Removed value: -"Cache Status"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / correlation_id / title
```
Removed value: -"Correlation Id"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / license / title
```
Removed value: -"License"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / source / title
```
Removed value: -"Source"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / properties / source_status / title
```
Removed value: -"Source Status"
```
- removedOutput schema / $defs / ToolMeta / title
```
Removed value: -"ToolMeta"
```
- removedOutput schema / properties / data / title
```
Removed value: -"Data"
```
- removedOutput schema / title
```
Removed value: -"ToolEnvelope"
```

Changed1 schema field changedJun 25, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$defs": {
+    "ToolMeta": {
+      "additionalProperties": true,
+      "description": "Envelope-Metadaten: Quelle, Status, Cache, Lizenz und Attribution.\n\nZusatzfelder (z.B. ``covered_cities``, ``radius_m`` bei partieller Abdeckung)\nbleiben dank ``extra=\"allow\"`` erhalten.",
+      "properties": {
+        "attribution": {
+          "title": "Attribution",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "cache_status": {
+          "title": "Cache Status",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "correlation_id": {
+          "title": "Correlation Id",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "license": {
+          "title": "License",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "source": {
+          "title": "Source",
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        "source_status": {
+          "title": "Source Status",
+          "type": "string"
+        }
+      },
+      "title": "ToolMeta",
+      "type": "object"
+    }
+  },
+  "properties": {
+    "data": {
+      "title": "Data"
+    },
+    "meta": {
+      "$ref": "#/$defs/ToolMeta"
+    }
+  },
+  "required": [
+    "data",
+    "meta"
+  ],
+  "title": "ToolEnvelope",
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedv1.0.0Jun 18, 2026

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, and idempotentHint. The description reaffirms read-only and adds output field context, which is valuable beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero wasted words. Front-loaded with the core action and output, then usage instruction.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero parameters, rich annotations, and output schema, the description is fully complete. It covers purpose, output, and usage order.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters, so baseline 4. The description adds value by listing the output fields, aiding in understanding the tool's response.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the verb 'List', the resource 'all covered cities', and the output fields (slug, federal state, population, coverage). It distinguishes from siblings by establishing the tool as a prerequisite for city-scoped tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states 'Call this first to discover valid city slugs before invoking any city-scoped tool.', providing clear when-to-use guidance and establishing a dependency.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server