word_apply_document_preset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the action without explaining side effects, such as whether existing document formatting is overwritten, whether the change is reversible, or if it applies to the entire document. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant words. It efficiently communicates the core action and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the parameter schema is thorough, the description lacks behavioral transparency and usage guidance. Since there are no annotations or output schema, the description should provide more context about the effects of applying a preset, but it does not, leaving the agent without a full understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides full descriptions for both parameters (file_path and preset), so the description adds little extra meaning. The baseline is 3 due to high schema coverage; the description does not provide additional parameter context like format constraints or typical usage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the action ('Apply'), the target resource ('Word document'), and the specific scope ('named page-layout + default-font preset'). It distinguishes from siblings like word_set_page_layout, which likely sets individual layout options rather than using a named preset.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for predefined presets, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like word_set_page_layout or word_format_text. There is no mention of when not to use it or any contrasting guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.