Skip to main content
Glama
stoyantsiparov

Office-MCP-Server

by stoyantsiparov
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Office-MCP-Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • DOCX MCP Server

      Mavline
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive DOCX/OOXML document manipulation via MCP, covering text, tables, images, content controls, comments, tracked changes, and metadata.
      34
      44 npm
      MIT

    • docx_mcp_server_ts

      Mavline
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables programmatic processing of DOCX/OOXML files through MCP, covering text, tables, images, headers/footers, structured data tags, comments, and track changes.
      29
      44 npm
      MIT

    • docx-mcp

      SecurityRonin
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for reading, editing, and validating Microsoft Word documents with specialized support for track changes, comments, and footnotes. It enables structural auditing, heading extraction, and precise OOXML-level document manipulation through natural language tools.
      100
      411 PyPI
      50
      MIT

    • mcp-office-parser

      as7722314
      A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables reading, writing, editing, and converting Office documents (ODT, DOCX, ODS, XLSX, PDF, etc.) using MCP tools, with no external dependencies.
      11
      7 npm
      MIT

    • InkPaw

      syouro
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to generate, edit, validate, and render Word documents programmatically via MCP, ensuring correct OOXML structure and style.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but a few pairs like add_comment/add_comments and edit_table_cells/edit_table_paragraphs could cause confusion without careful reading. Descriptions sufficiently differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent word_verb_noun pattern (e.g., word_read_document, word_insert_table, word_accept_all_changes), making actions and targets predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 37 tools, the server is over-sized compared to the typical 3-15 range. While the Word domain is broad, this count feels heavy and could overwhelm agents.

    Completeness3/5

    Core editing, formatting, tables, comments, and tracked changes are well covered, but several significant gaps exist: headers/footers and footnotes are read-only, and images can only be listed, not inserted or modified.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources