A
licenseA
qualityA
maintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with Anki flashcard software through AnkiConnect, allowing for creation and management of flashcards, decks, and note types.
16
1,233 npm
252
MIT
Anki MCP Server
by stefanwille
Related Servers
Alternatives to Anki MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that allows LLMs to interact with Anki flashcard software, enabling functions like creating decks, adding notes, searching cards, and managing flashcard content through natural language.1,233 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables interaction with Anki flashcards through AnkiConnect, providing organized tools for managing decks, notes, cards, models, and media files.407MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates with Anki flashcard application, allowing LLM applications like Claude to interact with your Anki decks and cards.111,233 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that bridges Claude AI with Anki flashcard app, allowing users to create and manage flashcards using natural language commands.9MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceServer that enables programmatic interaction with Anki through the Model Context Protocol, allowing users to manage flashcards, decks, and review processes.314 npm39MIT
TDQS
B3.3/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct operation on either decks or cards. There is no overlap: deck tools (create, delete, rename, list) are clearly separate from card tools (create, update, delete, list). No two tools could be confused.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase and underscores. Verbs like create, delete, get, list, rename, update are used appropriately. No style mixing or inconsistent naming.
Tool Count5/5
With 8 tools, the server covers essential deck and card operations without being excessive. The number is well-scoped for a focused Anki integration, neither too thin nor too heavy.
Completeness3/5
Core CRUD operations for decks and cards are present, but notable gaps exist: there is no way to retrieve a single card's details (only list cards in a deck), and card creation is limited to the Basic model. Features like moving cards between decks or searching are missing, leaving some workflows incomplete.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues