Skip to main content
Glama

anki-mcp

MCP server for Anki. This server allows interaction with Anki through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). It enables users to manage flashcards, decks, and review processes programmatically.

Watch the video

Prerequisites

  • Node.js and npm installed.

  • AnkiConnect plugin installed and running in Anki.

  • For audio features: Azure API key (set in .env file as AZURE_API_KEY) and Anki Media Directory (set as ANKI_MEDIA_DIR).

Related MCP server: Anki MCP Server

Setup and Execution

Highly recommended to run locally, since AnkiConnect only works locally.

Was only tested on windows.

Running locally via npx

If you only wish to use the tool and not develop the tool, you may launch an MCP STDIO server locally using npx:

npx -y github:nietus/anki-mcp

This can be used in Desktop MCP clients such as Msty Studio or others.

Running locally via source code

Alternatively, you can run locally via source code using these instructions:

  1. Clone the repository:

    git clone https://github.com/nietus/anki-mcp
  2. Install dependencies:

    npm install
  3. Build the project

    npm run build
  4. Setup for Audio Features (If you want to use audio tools):

    Create a .env file in the root directory with your Azure API key and Anki media directory:

    AZURE_API_KEY=your_azure_api_key_here
    ANKI_MEDIA_DIR=path/to/your/anki/media/directory

    For Anki media directory, use the path to your Anki collection.media folder. This is where audio files will be stored. If you have trouble, paste it directly into the code.

    • Windows example: C:\Users\username\AppData\Roaming\Anki2\User 1\collection.media

    • macOS example: /Users/username/Library/Application Support/Anki2/User 1/collection.media

    • Linux example: /home/username/.local/share/Anki2/User 1/collection.media

    Note: The ANKI_MEDIA_DIR is required for audio generation to work properly as Anki needs to find the audio files in its media collection.

  5. Integrate with Cursor settings (for local execution):

    To run your local build of anki-mcp with Cursor, you need to tell Cursor how to start the server. Below are example configurations which you can access on cursor settings. Replace YOUR_USERNAME and adjust the path if you cloned anki-mcp to a different location than Downloads.

    Windows:

    "anki": {
          "command": "cmd",
          "args": [
            "/c",
            "node",
            "c:/Users/YOUR_USERNAME/Downloads/anki-mcp/build/client.js"
        ]
    }
  6. Integrate with Claude Desktop using an .mcpb bundle:

    The recommended way to use this server with Claude Desktop is to install it as an MCP extension bundle (.mcpb file).

    1. Build and package the extension:

      npm install
      npm run build
      npm run pack:mcpb

      This will produce a file at dist/anki-mcp.mcpb.

    2. Install the bundle in Claude Desktop:

      • Open Claude Desktop.

      • Go to Settings → Extensions.

      • Drag and drop the dist/anki-mcp.mcpb file into the Extensions panel.

      Claude will handle launching the server automatically when needed.

    3. Configure environment variables:

      When prompted during installation, provide your AZURE_API_KEY and ANKI_MEDIA_DIR (the path to your Anki collection.media folder). These are required for audio features and media file handling.

    That’s it! No manual configuration is needed—Claude Desktop will manage the server for you once the .mcpb bundle is installed. macOS / Linux:

 "anki": {
       "command": "bash",
       "args": [
         "-c",
         "node /Users/YOUR_USERNAME/Downloads/anki-mcp/build/client.js"
       ]
     }

Create a Claude Desktop extension bundle (.mcpb)

If you want one-click installation inside Claude Desktop, you can package this server as an MCP bundle:

  1. Install dependencies and build the project:

    npm install
    npm run build
  2. Generate the .mcpb bundle (requires the @anthropic-ai/mcpb CLI, which expects Node.js 18+):

    npm run pack:mcpb

The script stages the compiled server (build/), copies runtime dependencies, and produces dist/anki-mcp.mcpb. Drag that file into Claude Desktop's Settings → Extensions panel to install. When prompted, provide the Azure Speech API key and Anki media directory so audio tools can save files in your collection.media folder.

Available Tools

To debug the tools, use

npm run inspector

The server provides the following tools for interacting with Anki:

  • update_cards:

    • Description: After the user answers cards you've quizzed them on, use this tool to mark them answered and update their ease.

    • Input: An array of answers, each with cardId (number) and ease (number, 1-4).

  • add_card:

    • Description: Create a NEW flashcard in Anki. Use ONLY for creating new cards, NOT for updating existing ones (will throw an error if the card already exists). For updating existing cards, use update_note_fields with the noteId instead. Note content uses HTML.

      • Line breaks: <br>

      • Code: <pre style="background-color: transparent; padding: 10px; border-radius: 5px;">

      • Lists: <ol> and <li>

      • Bold: <strong>

      • Italic: <em>

    • Input:

      • fields: (object) An object where keys are field names (e.g., "Hanzi", "Pinyin") and values are their HTML content.

      • modelName: (string) The name of the Anki note type (model) to use.

      • deckName: (optional string) The name of the deck to add the card to. Defaults to the current deck or 'Default'.

      • tags: (optional array of strings) A list of tags to add to the note.

  • add_card_with_audio:

    • Description: Create a NEW flashcard in Anki with automatically generated audio from Azure TTS. Use ONLY for creating new cards, NOT for updating existing ones (will throw an error if the card already exists). For updating audio on existing cards, use update_card_with_audio with the noteId instead.

    • Input:

      • fields, modelName, deckName, tags: Same as add_card.

      • sourceField: (string) Field name containing the text to generate audio from.

      • audioField: (string) Field name where the generated audio will be stored.

      • language: (optional string) Language code for TTS (e.g., 'en', 'es', 'fr'). Defaults to 'en'.

    • Supported languages: en, es, fr, de, it, ja, ko, pt, ru, zh, ar, nl, hi, tr, pl, sv, fi, da, no, cs, hu, el, he, th, vi, id, ms, ro.

  • update_card_with_audio:

    • Description: Update an EXISTING card by generating audio from a specified field and adding it to an audio field. Use ONLY for cards that already exist (you must have the noteId). For creating new cards with audio, use add_card_with_audio instead.

    • Input:

      • noteId: (number) The ID of the Anki note to update.

      • sourceField: (string) Field name containing the text to generate audio from.

      • audioField: (string) Field name where the generated audio will be stored.

      • language: (optional string) Language code for TTS. Defaults to 'en'.

  • get_due_cards:

    • Description: Returns a given number of cards due for review.

    • Input: num (number).

  • get_new_cards:

    • Description: Returns a given number of new and unseen cards.

    • Input: num (number).

  • get_deck_names:

    • Description: Get a list of all Anki deck names.

    • Input: None.

  • find_cards:

    • Description: Find cards using a raw Anki search query. Returns detailed card information including fields.

    • Input: query (string, e.g., 'deck:Default -tag:test', or '"deck:My Deck" tag:important'). To filter for empty fields, use '-FieldName:_*' (e.g., '-Hanzi:_*').

  • update_note_fields:

    • Description: Update specific fields of an EXISTING Anki note. Use ONLY when you already have the noteId of an existing card. For creating new cards, use add_card instead.

    • Input: noteId (number), fields (object, e.g., {"Front": "New Q", "Back": "New A"}).

  • create_deck:

    • Description: Create a new Anki deck.

    • Input: deckName (string).

  • bulk_update_notes:

    • Description: RECOMMENDED FOR MULTIPLE CARDS: Update specific fields for multiple EXISTING Anki notes in a single operation. Much more efficient than updating cards one by one. Use ONLY when you have noteIds for cards that already exist. For creating new cards in bulk, use add_bulk instead. Always complete all updates in a single operation whenever possible.

    • Input: An array of notes, where each note has noteId (number) and fields (object).

  • get_model_names:

    • Description: Lists all available Anki note type/model names.

    • Input: None.

  • get_model_details:

    • Description: Retrieves the fields, card templates, and CSS styling for a specified note type.

    • Input: modelName (string).

  • get_deck_model_info:

    • Description: Retrieves information about the note types (models) used within a specified deck. Helps determine if a single model is used, multiple, or if the deck is empty or non-existent.

    • Input: deckName (string).

    • Output: An object with deckName, status (e.g., "single_model_found", "multiple_models_found", "no_notes_found", "deck_not_found"), and conditionally modelName (string) or modelNames (array of strings).

  • add_note_type_field:

    • Description: Adds a new field to a note type.

    • Input: modelName (string), fieldName (string).

  • remove_note_type_field:

    • Description: Removes an existing field from a note type.

    • Input: modelName (string), fieldName (string).

  • rename_note_type_field:

    • Description: Renames a field in a note type.

    • Input: modelName (string), oldFieldName (string), newFieldName (string).

  • reposition_note_type_field:

    • Description: Changes the order (index) of a field in a note type.

    • Input: modelName (string), fieldName (string), index (number).

  • update_note_type_templates:

    • Description: Updates the HTML templates (e.g., front and back) for the cards of a note type.

    • Input: modelName (string), templates (object, e.g., {"Card 1": {"Front": "html", "Back": "html"}}).

  • update_note_type_styling:

    • Description: Updates the CSS styling for a note type.

    • Input: modelName (string), css (string).

  • create_model:

    • Description: Creates a new Anki note type (model).

    • Input: modelName (string), fieldNames (array of strings), cardTemplates (array of objects, each with Name, Front, Back HTML strings), css (optional string), isCloze (optional boolean, defaults to false), modelType (optional string, defaults to 'Standard').

  • add_bulk:

    • Description: RECOMMENDED FOR MULTIPLE CARDS: Adds multiple NEW flashcards to Anki in a single operation. Much more efficient than adding cards one by one. Use ONLY for creating new cards, NOT for updating existing ones (will throw errors for any cards that already exist). For updating existing cards, use bulk_update_notes with noteIds instead. Always complete all additions in a single operation whenever possible. Must use HTML formatting for card content.

    • Input: An array of notes, where each note object has:

      • fields: (object) An object where keys are field names and values are their HTML content.

      • modelName: (string) The name of the Anki note type (model) to use for this note.

      • deckName: (optional string) The name of the deck for this note. Defaults to 'Default'.

      • tags: (optional array of strings) A list of tags for this note.

  • undo:

    • Description: Undo the most recent action in Anki's collection — a card review, a field edit, a suspend, etc. Only undoes one action at a time; call repeatedly to undo further back.

    • Input: None.

More information can be found here Anki Integration | Smithery

Available Tools

3 tools
anki_add_noteC

Add a flashcard to an Anki deck

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
backYesBack of the flashcard
deckNameYesThe target deck name
frontYesFront of the flashcard

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the action ('Add') but doesn't cover critical aspects like whether this is a mutation (likely yes), error handling (e.g., if the deck doesn't exist), permissions needed, or response format. This leaves significant gaps for safe and effective tool invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, direct sentence with zero wasted words, making it highly efficient and front-loaded. It immediately conveys the core purpose without unnecessary elaboration, earning full marks for conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity as a mutation operation with no annotations and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It doesn't address behavioral traits, error conditions, or return values, leaving the agent with incomplete information for reliable use in a broader context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage, clearly documenting all three required parameters (deckName, front, back). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as formatting examples or constraints, so it meets the baseline for adequate but not enhanced parameter guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Add') and resource ('flashcard to an Anki deck'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'anki_add_notes' (plural) or 'anki_create_deck', which would require more specificity about scope or use cases.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'anki_add_notes' or 'anki_create_deck'. It lacks context about prerequisites, such as whether the deck must exist, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer usage from tool names alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

anki_add_notesC

Add multiple flashcards to an Anki deck

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cardsYes
deckNameYesThe target deck name

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states the tool adds cards, implying a write operation, but lacks critical behavioral details: whether it requires authentication, how it handles duplicates or errors, if it's idempotent, or what the response format is. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste. It's front-loaded and appropriately sized for the tool's complexity, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (a write operation with 2 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema), the description is incomplete. It lacks behavioral context, error handling details, and guidance on usage versus siblings, leaving the agent with insufficient information for reliable invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50% (only 'deckName' has a description). The description adds minimal value beyond the schema, as 'Add multiple flashcards' hints at the 'cards' array but doesn't explain its structure or semantics. With partial schema coverage, the description doesn't adequately compensate for undocumented parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Add multiple flashcards') and resource ('to an Anki deck'), distinguishing it from the sibling 'anki_add_note' (singular vs. multiple). However, it doesn't specify what constitutes a 'flashcard' beyond the schema's front/back structure, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives is provided. The description implies bulk addition, but it doesn't clarify prerequisites (e.g., deck must exist), when to use 'anki_add_note' for single cards, or how it relates to 'anki_create_deck'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

anki_create_deckC

Create a new Anki deck

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
deckNameYesThe name of the deck to create

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states 'Create a new Anki deck', implying a write operation, but lacks details on permissions, error handling, or what happens if the deck already exists. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool without annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and efficiently conveys the core purpose without unnecessary elaboration.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that this is a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to address behavioral aspects like side effects, return values, or error conditions, which are crucial for an agent to use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema description coverage is 100%, with the single parameter 'deckName' fully documented in the schema. The description does not add any additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, such as format constraints or examples, so it meets the baseline for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and resource ('new Anki deck'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like 'anki_add_note' or 'anki_add_notes', which are about adding notes rather than creating decks, so it misses explicit sibling distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There are no mentions of prerequisites, context, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer usage based on the tool name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Disambiguation3/5

The tools have overlapping purposes, as 'anki_add_note' and 'anki_add_notes' both handle adding flashcards, which could cause confusion for an agent deciding between single vs. batch operations. However, the descriptions clarify the distinction (single vs. multiple), mitigating some ambiguity. The 'anki_create_deck' tool is clearly distinct, focusing on deck management rather than note addition.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent 'anki_' prefix and snake_case pattern (e.g., anki_add_note, anki_add_notes, anki_create_deck), with clear verb_noun structures. This predictability makes it easy for agents to understand and navigate the tool set without confusion from mixed conventions.

Tool Count2/5

With only 3 tools, the server feels thin for managing Anki flashcards, a domain that typically involves operations like updating, deleting, reviewing, or searching notes and decks. The count is too low for the apparent scope, lacking essential CRUD lifecycle coverage beyond basic creation, which may limit agent functionality.

Completeness2/5

The tool set is severely incomplete for Anki management, covering only note addition and deck creation. Obvious gaps include updating or deleting notes/decks, listing or searching existing content, and handling reviews or scheduling—core aspects of flashcard workflows. This will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform common tasks beyond initial setup.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessUnresponsive

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nietus/anki-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server