Skip to main content
Glama
Diogenes Web3, DeFi & HTTP 402 Security MCP

Diogenes Web3, DeFi & HTTP 402 Security MCP

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
contract_auditC

Smart contract honeypot, hidden transfer tax, proxy upgrade, and mint backdoor auditor across EVM, Solana, and Move.

solana_riskB

Audits Solana SPL token mint authority, freeze authority, top-holder concentration, and LP lock status.

mev_riskB

Pre-swap MEV sandwich and frontrunning risk evaluator returning optimal slippage in basis points.

address_poisoning_detectorC

Detects zero-value transfer spoofing and prefix/suffix vanity lookalike address poisoning attacks.

http402_challenge_verifierC

Verifies inbound HTTP 402 (L402 BOLT11, x402 Solana, MPP Base) payment challenges against overcharge and recipient spoofing.

utxo_consolidation_plannerC

Computes exact SegWit/Taproot vByte weights, dust thresholds, and optimal mempool fee windows for UTXO batching.

crypto_bridge_quoteC

Compares non-KYC cross-chain settlement routes (THORChain, Liquid, Maya) for BTC, SOL, ETH, SUI, and USDC.

solana_whale_radarC

Tracks high-conviction Solana whale wallets and insider accumulation clusters.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Scored across 8 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target clearly distinct threats: MEV, address poisoning, HTTP 402 verification, UTXO consolidation, bridge quotes, and Solana whale tracking. There is some overlap among contract_audit, solana_risk, and solana_whale_radar on Solana token/security analysis, but the descriptions differentiate their scopes enough to guide selection.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names use consistent snake_case noun-phrase conventions with no mixed camelCase or verb-style inconsistencies. The pattern is predictable and readable throughout.

Tool Count5/5

Eight tools is well-scoped for a Web3, DeFi, and HTTP 402 security server. Each tool covers a distinct security or planning concern without obvious redundancy.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers a broad range of Web3 security concerns, including contract auditing, MEV, address poisoning, HTTP 402 verification, UTXO planning, bridge quotes, and whale tracking. Minor gaps exist, such as token approval/allowance checks, phishing or site verification, and challenge generation for HTTP 402, but agents can work around these.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues