get_quote

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided so description carries full burden. States it gets details and status but doesn't disclose that it is read-only, or any authentication/rate limit needs. Adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no wasted words. Essential information presented efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Simple tool with one parameter and no output schema; description covers main purpose. However, lacks information on return structure or potential errors, which would be helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and parameter description is clear ('The quote ID to look up'). Description adds no extra context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool retrieves details of an existing quote including status, with a specific verb 'get' and resource 'quote'. Distinguishes from sibling 'create_quote' which creates quotes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use for existing quotes but no explicit guidance on when to use versus alternatives like 'list_transfers' or when not to use. Sibling tools exist but no comparison.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.