Stables MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Stables MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to add stablecoin checkout, create payment links and invoices, configure webhooks, verify payment signatures, and gate access based on confirmed payment events.MIT

Yolfi MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to add stablecoin checkout, payment links, payment status checks, webhook verification, and webhook-based access logic to applications through an API-first payment workflow.MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to integrate stablecoin crypto checkout, payment links, payment status checks, webhook verification, and webhook-based access logic into applications.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to integrate stablecoin checkout, payment links, payment status checks, webhook verification, and webhook-based access logic into applications.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to add stablecoin checkout, payment links, payment status checks, webhook verification, and webhook-based entitlement logic to applications. It also provides tools for workspace registration, settlement and webhook configuration, paylink creation, and crypto payment status checks.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to add stablecoin checkout, payment links, payment status checks, webhook verification, and webhook-based access logic to applications.-
TDQS
Scored across 51 tools
Most tools map to a distinct resource+action, and the descriptions actively disambiguate near-pairs such as list_rfis vs list_customer_rfis, create_customer vs create_customer_onboarding_link, get_verification_link vs the onboarding link, and validate_payment_method vs create_transfer. The main friction is the same entity being called both a 'virtual account' and a 'payment route' (create_virtual_account vs update_route_destination), plus several update_* tools on routes that require reading descriptions to tell apart.
Nearly everything follows a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_/get_/create_/update_/delete_/add_/submit_/simulate_). Minor deviations: request_entitlements is a bare verb with no noun, and the vocabulary drifts between 'virtual_account' and 'route' for the same object, so the names alone are not fully predictable.
51 tools is a large surface, well past the 15-tool comfort band, and the agent must choose among many closely related CRUD endpoints. The domain genuinely is broad (customers, KYC, quotes, transfers, routes, RFIs, entitlements, documents, webhooks, balance), so the tools are not gratuitous, but the count is still heavy for reliable selection.
Coverage is strong across the lifecycle: customers (create/update/metadata/onboarding link), transfers (create/get/list), quotes (create/get), routes (create/update/list/history/whitelist/payid), documents (add/list/download/delete), webhooks, API keys, balance, entitlements and RFIs. Gaps are modest but real: no cancel/refund a transfer, no delete/close a payment route, and no get/update for an individual webhook.