OpenRouter MCP Multimodal Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to OpenRouter MCP Multimodal Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceProvides access to OpenRouter.ai's diverse model ecosystem for text chat and image analysis capabilities, with support for multimodal conversations and automatic image optimization.712-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables chat and image analysis through OpenRouter.ai models. Supports text chat, image generation, and analysis with multiple images and custom questions.998Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides access to 400+ AI models from OpenRouter, enabling users to chat with models like GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and Llama, compare responses across multiple models, and retrieve model information with pricing details.42013MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides integration with OpenRouter.ai, allowing access to various AI models through a unified interface.418163Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables vision capabilities for any AI model by routing image analysis requests through OpenRouter's vision models. It provides tools to analyze images from URLs, local file paths, or base64 data.27220MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI vision analysis via OpenRouter, enabling image understanding from local paths or URLs. Supports OCR, error diagnosis, and chart/UI analysis using Gemini models.118MIT
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool targets a distinct function: analyzing audio/image/video, generating content, chat completions, and model queries. No two tools have overlapping purposes, and even the video generation status tool is clearly a helper for async workflows.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (analyze_, generate_, get_, search_, validate_). The exception is 'chat_completion', which combines two nouns rather than a verb_noun, causing a minor inconsistency in the naming style.
With 11 tools, the set covers all major modalities (audio, image, video, text) and supporting functions (model info, search, validation). The count is well-balanced—not excessive or too sparse for the server's multimodal purpose.
Core analysis, generation, and query tools are present. Some minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit tool for listing all models, though search_models and get_model_info cover it). Overall, the surface is comprehensive for typical multimodal workflows.