get_lead
Retrieve full details of a specific lead by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Get full details for a specific lead by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The lead ID (from add_lead or list_leads) |
Retrieve full details of a specific lead by providing its unique ID.
Get full details for a specific lead by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The lead ID (from add_lead or list_leads) |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It says 'Get full details' but does not specify the structure of the response or any potential limits. The description is adequate but not enhanced.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence with no wasted words, front-loaded with the core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is mostly complete. It could mention that the output contains lead details, but it's implied.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, with the id parameter described as 'The lead ID (from add_lead or list_leads)'. The description adds no further meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves full details for a specific lead by ID, using a specific verb and resource. It implicitly distinguishes from siblings like list_leads (list) and add_lead (create).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description indicates the tool is for getting details by ID, making usage clear. However, it does not explicitly contrast with siblings like list_leads for when to use a list instead.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ssaffhauser-web/kpi-dealflow-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server