Orihime
Related Servers
Alternatives to Orihime
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceInstant codebase knowledge graph MCP server. It auto-detects languages, indexes functions, classes, and call chains, enabling LLMs to navigate code in milliseconds.24MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceHigh-performance code intelligence MCP server. Indexes codebases into a persistent knowledge graph — average repo in milliseconds. 159 languages, sub-ms queries, 99% fewer tokens. Single static binary, zero dependencies.1543,043MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceFramework-aware code intelligence MCP server that builds a cross-language dependency graph from source code. 53 integrations (Laravel, Django, Rails, Spring, NestJS, Next.js, and more) across 68 languages. 100+ tools for navigation, impact analysis, refactoring, security scanning, session memory, and CI/PR reports — up to 97% token reduction.292,674 npm175MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA high-performance code knowledge graph server implementing MCP, indexing codebases into a structured AST knowledge graph with semantic search, call graph traversal, and HTTP route tracing.3,510 npm75MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA knowledge graph MCP server that indexes your codebase into a local SQLite graph and provides tools for project mapping, file summaries, and impact analysis, drastically reducing token usage in AI coding assistants.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceZero-dependency Go MCP server that indexes codebases into an embedded Kùzu graph DB—enabling 90%+ token reduction, precise call-chain queries, and AI architectural health audits.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 33 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is notable overlap in the taint analysis family (find_taint_sinks, find_taint_flows, find_taint_paths, find_reachable_sinks, find_cross_service_taint, find_second_order_injection) and call graph queries (find_callers, blast_radius, find_endpoint_callers). Detailed descriptions help distinguish them, but an agent could misselect between similar-sounding tools.
Naming follows a mostly consistent verb_noun pattern with find_* for queries and list_* for enumerations. However, there are deviations like search_symbol, get_file_location, ingest_perf_results, index_repo_tool, generate_security_report, estimate_capacity, and blast_radius, which mix conventions. Still readable and predictable overall.
33 tools is above the typical heavy threshold (25+), but the server is a comprehensive static analysis platform covering indexing, security, performance, dependencies, and call graphs. While each tool has a purpose, the count feels large and could be consolidated (e.g., merging some taint variants), making it borderline appropriate.
The toolset covers the core lifecycle of static analysis: indexing, searching, security (taint, license), performance (hotspots, capacity, cascade), dependencies, and call graph traversal. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool to delete a repository or retrieve all methods in a class, but these are not critical to the primary workflows.