Zendesk MCP Server (Extended)
Related Servers
Alternatives to Zendesk MCP Server (Extended)
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for managing Zendesk Support, Talk, Chat, and Guide products, providing tools for tickets, users, organizations, search, and more.4930-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Zendesk support workflows that enables ticket search, lookup, creation, commenting, status updates, and user listing through natural language. It uses OAuth authentication and supports both internal notes and public comments.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that authenticates via browser session cookies to access Zendesk's REST API without API tokens, supporting reads and writes with agent permissions.1912 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server for Zendesk Support that connects AI agents to 14 ticket tools including create, search, assign, close, comments, and metrics.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides operational tooling over the Zendesk Support API — ticket triage, SLA monitoring, agent workload analysis, and system health audits.111MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants like Claude to interact with Zendesk Support through natural language for searching, creating, updating, and managing tickets.41336 npm3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: groups, ticket fields, attachments, users, tickets (CRUD and search), comments, articles. Descriptions clearly differentiate similar tools like get_ticket vs get_tickets and search_tickets vs get_tickets.
All tools follow a consistent verb_snake_case pattern (list_, get_, search_, create_, update_, upload_). No mixing of conventions or ambiguous verb choices.
14 tools cover the essential operations for a Zendesk support MCP server: ticket lifecycle, user/group lookup, comment management, attachments, and article search. The count feels well-scoped without bloat.
Core ticket workflows are covered (CRUD, comments, attachments, search, user/group resolution). Missing delete ticket and some admin features, but these are reasonable omissions for an agent-focused server.