Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP OpenFoodTox

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying EFSA's toxicological reference values for chemicals in food and feed, including hazard profiles with assessment bodies and critical endpoints, and substance search across 3,437 substances and 8,620 reference values.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying JECFA safety evaluations for food additives, flavourings, contaminants, and veterinary drugs, providing acceptable daily intakes, conclusions, and toxicological monographs via MCP tools.
      260 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables checking food additive safety, nutrition profiles, pesticide residues, and ingredient lists with regulatory flags and dietary compatibility. All data is sourced from authoritative bodies like JECFA, EFSA, and FDA.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving toxicological evaluations for pesticides, including Acceptable Daily Intakes, Acute Reference Doses, chemical details, and meeting conclusions.
      241 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides chemical hazard data from ECHA, NIOSH, GHS, and ICSC, enabling lookups of SVHC status, occupational exposure limits, GHS classifications, and cross-references to cosmetic and food additive databases.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting different data tables (genotoxicity, opinions, risk assessments, etc.), but there is some overlap between list_hazard_ids_by_assessment and list_substances_by_assessment, as both filter risk assessments by similar criteria but return different outputs (IDs vs. substances). The descriptions clarify the distinction, but an agent might initially confuse them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (e.g., get_genotox_details, list_substances_by_assessment). The naming is predictable and readable, with no mixing of conventions or chaotic styles.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the count is well-scoped for a database query server covering multiple data tables and filtering options. Each tool serves a clear purpose in retrieving or listing data, and none feel redundant or excessive for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset provides comprehensive coverage for querying the OpenFoodTox database, including retrieval of detailed records (get_* tools) and filtered listings (list_* tools). A minor gap is the lack of a tool for updating or deleting data, but this is reasonable for a read-only query server focused on EFSA assessments.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues