Skip to main content
Glama

openfoodtox

EFSA's derived toxicological reference values for chemicals in food and feed — acceptable daily intakes, acute reference doses, tolerable intakes and operator exposure levels — with the assessment body and critical endpoint behind each one.

Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1576+ live data sources.

3,437 substances, 8,620 reference values.

Source

OpenFoodTox 3.0, Zenodo record 19388272 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19388272), published 2026-04-30, CC-BY-4.0.

Extracted from EFSA's official .xlsx export — nothing is scraped. The data ships inside the pack rather than being fetched per call, so answers do not depend on Zenodo being reachable. Every response carries the DOI, publication date and licence.

Related MCP server: food-safety-mcp

Tools

1. Hazard profile. "What is the ADI for glyphosate?" → openfoodtox_hazard_profile({substance: "glyphosate"}) → every reference value EFSA has derived, each with its unit, assessment body and critical endpoint.

2. Find the substance. "Which aflatoxins has EFSA assessed?" → openfoodtox_search({query: "aflatoxin"}) → matching substances and how many reference values each carries.

Two things that shape the output

One substance can have several legitimate values. Cadmium carries a tolerable weekly intake of 2.5 µg/kg bw from EFSA and 7 from the older JECFA assessment. Both are real. The pack lists them with their assessment bodies rather than reconciling them — picking one would invent a consensus that does not exist.

Absence is not zero. A substance with no derived reference value returns found:false with an explicit statement that this is not a finding of safety. An empty list here would read as "no limit applies" to a chemical in food.

Refreshing

Re-run the extractor against a newer Zenodo record and re-run the tests. The tests assert specific published values (glyphosate ADI 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, aspartame 40, cadmium TWI 2.5) precisely so a refresh that breaks the join fails loudly instead of quietly changing numbers.

Column layout worth knowing if you touch the extractor: reference-value columns are IUCLID dotted paths with a nested element between the metric and the field (HumanHealthHazardCharacteristics.AcceptableDailyIntake.Adi.lowerValue), and that element differs per metric. Match on the tail of the path, not the composed name — matching the composed name parses every row, joins every key, and yields an empty dataset.

Quick Start

Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openfoodtox": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/openfoodtox/mcp"
    }
  }
}

What this endpoint actually serves

tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/openfoodtox/mcp returns the tools in the table above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-toolsask_pipeworx, discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and is the authoritative answer for a given day.

This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth, connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.

Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "pipeworx": {
      "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1576+ data sources. The only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx reaches all of them from either one.

Standalone (no gateway account)

This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no gateway round-trip:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "openfoodtox": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-openfoodtox"]
    }
  }
}

Or run it directly to confirm it starts:

npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-openfoodtox

It speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers initialize/tools/list/tools/call for only this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.

Using with ask_pipeworx

Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:

ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Openfoodtox data" })

The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.

More

License

MIT

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables natural language querying of EFSA's OpenFoodTox database containing 8,006 chemical substances with toxicity data, safety assessments, risk limits, and genotoxicity studies for food additives, pesticides, and contaminants.
    9
    5
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables checking food additive safety, nutrition profiles, pesticide residues, and ingredient lists with regulatory flags and dietary compatibility. All data is sourced from authoritative bodies like JECFA, EFSA, and FDA.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    C
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A server for food-mediated oral exposure screening, governed contaminant and pesticide review, and version-pinned dietary evidence handoffs, converting commodity residues and consumption profiles into auditable intake summaries and PBPK-ready exports.
    49
    1
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides chemical hazard data from ECHA, NIOSH, GHS, and ICSC, enabling lookups of SVHC status, occupational exposure limits, GHS classifications, and cross-references to cosmetic and food additive databases.
    MIT