cf-mcp-orange
Related Servers
Alternatives to cf-mcp-orange
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server for GitHub and competitive programming (Codeforces) that enables AI assistants to fetch user profiles, repository stats, contest history, and personalized problem recommendations.MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to discover unsolved Codeforces practice problems, analyze tag performance, and inspect submissions, profiles, rating history, and upcoming contests through MCP-compatible clients.6-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables analyzing Codeforces activity through local MCP tools, including weekly practice summaries, problem recommendations, user comparisons, weak-topic detection, contest tracking, and rating progress.-
- AlicenseCqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for LeetCode that enables AI assistants to access LeetCode problems, user information, and contest data.79 npm43MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA tutorial and working MCP server that connects to your LeetCode profile, enabling AI assistants to check solved problems and recommend new ones by topic and difficulty.1-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceUniversal MCP server that analyzes any codebase and provides structured context to AI assistants. Dynamic, accurate, and token-efficient.187 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: user comparison, profile retrieval, submission history, problem details, problem search, and three distinct practice recommendation strategies (weakness-based, random, contest-upsolve). Descriptions are detailed enough to prevent confusion.
All tools follow verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with seven starting with 'get_' and one starting with 'compare_'. This slight inconsistency is minor but noticeable.
Eight tools cover the core needs for a Codeforces practice assistant without being overwhelming. Each tool serves a necessary function, and the count feels well-scoped.
The set covers user profiles, submissions, problem search, and multiple practice recommendations. Missing features like contest listing or editorial access are minor omissions given the focus on individual practice.