No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 2 tools
Search is for discovering provider function signatures, while execute runs JavaScript in the sandbox; the descriptions clearly separate these phases and explicitly link them. However, the bare name 'search' could initially be mistaken for a provider-level search action rather than meta-discovery, and there is no distinct 'list' tool since search doubles as listing when the query is omitted.
Both tools use a consistent single-verb convention with no mixing of camelCase or snake_case. The names are generic and lack an object (e.g., search_tools or execute_code), but the style is predictable across the set.
Two tools exactly match the two-phase Code Mode workflow: discover available provider functions, then execute a program that calls them. It is on the thin side of the typical 3-15 range, but each tool clearly earns its place and there is no redundancy.
The core lifecycle is covered: search handles both listing and keyword lookup, and execute supports provider invocation, parallelism, and output. Minor gaps exist around explicit job-status polling, cancellation, and provider configuration management, though these may be reachable through execute calls.