Skip to main content
Glama

scan_zendesk

Detect leaked secrets in Zendesk tickets. Reports available in n0s1, SARIF, or GitLab format with optional AI credential validation.

Instructions

Scan Zendesk tickets for leaked secrets

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
serverYesZendesk subdomain e.g. mycompany.zendesk.com
emailYesZendesk user email
api_keyYesZendesk API token
report_formatNon0s1
show_matched_secret_on_logsNoShow matched secret values in reports and logs (default: false)
ai_analysisNoQueue async AI credential validation after the scan (requires n0s1 Pro)
n0s1_api_keyNon0s1 API key; overrides the N0S1_TOKEN env var
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description does not disclose behavioral traits (e.g., destructive nature, rate limits, or async behavior). Only the bare action is stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with the tool's purpose. It is concise but could be slightly expanded for clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, no annotations, and seven parameters. The description does not explain what happens after scanning (e.g., where results go, async behavior), making it incomplete for a complex tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 86%, so the schema already handles parameter documentation. Description adds no extra parameter meaning beyond the tool's purpose.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states 'Scan Zendesk tickets for leaked secrets' with a specific verb ('scan') and resource ('Zendesk tickets'), clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like scan_github or scan_jira.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites or exclusions mentioned. The description just names the action without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/spark1security/n0s1-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server