Skip to main content
Glama

scan_jira

Scan Jira tickets for exposed secrets, credentials, and sensitive data. Generate reports in multiple formats and optionally post warning comments.

Instructions

Scan Jira tickets for leaked secrets

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
serverYesJira server URL e.g. https://company.atlassian.net
emailYesJira user email
api_keyYesJira API token
scopeNoJQL query e.g. jql:project = SEC
post_commentNoAuto-post warning comments on findings
report_formatNon0s1
show_matched_secret_on_logsNoShow matched secret values in reports and logs (default: false)
ai_analysisNoQueue async AI credential validation after the scan (requires n0s1 Pro)
n0s1_api_keyNon0s1 API key; overrides the N0S1_TOKEN env var
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description does not disclose side effects (e.g., posting comments), authentication requirements beyond schema, or any behavioral nuances. It is too vague for a tool with multiple parameters and potential actions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded, no wasted words. Perfectly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, description does not explain return values, async behavior (ai_analysis), or what happens after scanning. Incomplete for a tool with 9 parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 89%, so the description doesn't need to add much. However, it adds no value beyond the schema descriptions. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool scans Jira tickets for leaked secrets, which is a specific verb-resource pair. It distinguishes from sibling tools that target other platforms like Asana, GitHub, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/spark1security/n0s1-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server