plugin_list
List all loaded plugins with their status and registered extensions to inspect active components.
Instructions
List all loaded plugins with status and registered extensions
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all loaded plugins with their status and registered extensions to inspect active components.
List all loaded plugins with status and registered extensions
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description indicates a read-only listing action but does not provide additional behavioral details beyond the obvious. Since annotations are absent, the description bears the full burden but remains somewhat minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Front-loaded with core purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter list tool, the description is largely complete. It covers what it does and the output content. Minor gap: could mention it only shows already loaded plugins, but that is implicit.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters, so baseline 4 per guidelines. Schema coverage is 100% and description adds no param info, which is acceptable.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states 'List all loaded plugins with status and registered extensions', specifying the verb (list), resource (loaded plugins), and scope (all, with status and extensions). Distinguished from sibling tools like plugin_load and plugin_unload.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., plugin_load, plugin_unload). No when-not-to-use or prerequisites mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sole03/governflow'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server