Skip to main content
Glama
sole03

mcp-rule-engine

by sole03
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-rule-engine

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • RulesetMCP

      n8daniels
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with queryable, version-controlled project rules and coding standards. Enables validation, rule-based guidance, and task summaries to keep AI work aligned with your project's conventions without repeating context.
      2
      MIT

    • mcp-code-context

      achatainga
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to efficiently read, write, and refactor code using precise AST-based operations, reducing token usage and context window waste.
      25
      17 npm
      3
      MIT

    • focal-mcp

      BAESI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Centralizes AI behavior rules and applies them across tools like Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor, enabling agents to fetch up-to-date rules before responding.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., session, webhook, plugin groups), but 'capture_diff' and 'analyze_workspace' both analyze diffs for rule violations, and 'query_rules' vs 'list_rules' overlap in listing rules. This causes minor ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, with domain prefixes (cognition_, governance_) applied uniformly. No mixed conventions or irregularities.

    Tool Count3/5

    28 tools is slightly above the typical well-scoped range (3-15). The broad domain (rule management, cognition, sessions, webhooks, plugins) justifies the count, but it feels heavy for a single server.

    Completeness3/5

    Core rule lifecycle (create via generate, confirm/edit, list, query, resolve conflicts) is covered, but a 'delete_rule' tool is missing. Session, webhook, and plugin management appear complete, leaving minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources