notion_update_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses important behavioral details: omitted properties are left unchanged, empty title keeps current, and icon can be set to 'remove' to clear it. These go beyond basic semantics. However, it does not mention error behavior, permission requirements, or side effects like partial failures, and annotations are absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with a one-sentence purpose, followed by a clear bullet-like list of parameters. Every sentence earns its place, and there is no redundant or extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers all parameters and core behavior, and the output schema likely explains return values. However, it lacks formatting details for properties_json (e.g., the structure of property value objects) and doesn't mention error cases for invalid page_id or JSON, leaving some gaps for first-time users.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description provides detailed, inline documentation for every parameter, adding significant meaning beyond the schema's opaque names. It explains the purpose and valid values (e.g., 'remove' for icon), which is especially valuable given the 0% schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates a Notion page's title, icon, or properties, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like notion_update_block or notion_set_page_visual by specifying exactly what it modifies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention exclusions, prerequisites, or which specific scenario this tool is best suited for. The user must infer usage from the purpose statement.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.