Skip to main content
Glama
smaniches

AlphaFold Sovereign MCP

by smaniches
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to AlphaFold Sovereign MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • BioMCP

      qgeng1465
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      BioMCP is an open-source MCP server that connects any AI assistant to 15 open bioinformatics databases with zero configuration. It provides 23 tools for literature, sequences, BLAST, structures, enrichment, annotations, genomes, interactions, variants, domains, compounds, and single-cell data.
      73
      23 PyPI
      12
      -

    • BioMCP

      yeyuan98
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A high-performance MCP server that gives LLMs access to 25 biomedical tools federated across 50+ upstream APIs for genes, variants, drugs, diseases, literature, clinical trials, and structural biology.
      41
      190 npm
      12
      Apache 2.0

    • BioBTree

      tamerh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A unified biomedical graph database that integrates 50+ primary data sources — genes, proteins, compounds, diseases, pathways, and clinical data — into a single queryable graph with billions of cross-reference edges. Its native MCP server gives LLMs direct access to structured, authoritative biomedical data, complementing their reasoning with reliable identifiers and up-to-date database content.
      20
      AGPL 3.0

    • OrigeneMCP

      GENTEL-lab
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An advanced integrated MCP server platform that combines 600+ tools and multiple biomedical databases to enable comprehensive information retrieval across molecules, proteins, genes, and diseases for accelerating therapeutic research.
      39
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 30 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct in purpose, e.g., lookup vs search, local vs live queries. Minor overlaps exist among variant-focused tools (triage_variant_3d, generate_variant_clinical_report, classify_variant_acmg) but descriptions effectively differentiate them. Overall, an agent can reliably distinguish tool roles.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a consistent pattern: lowercase with underscores, predominantly verb_noun (e.g., lookup_disease, get_disease_targets, analyze_structural_confidence). Even exceptions like phenotype_to_structures are still descriptive and fit the pattern. No mixing of styles ensures predictability.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 30 tools, the set is on the high side but still within a reasonable range for the broad domain (disease, variant, protein, drug). Some related tools (e.g., three topology comparison tools) could potentially be consolidated, but each serves a distinct analytical step. Slightly heavy but justified.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface is comprehensive, covering disease ontology, variant interpretation, protein structure confidence/pockets/topology, drug-target landscapes, and local knowledge graph management. Notable gaps: triage_variant_3d explicitly lacks some data sources (AlphaMissense, per-variant frequencies) that are available in other tools, creating a partial dead end. Overall, the domain is well-covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources