docker_container_restart
Restart a Docker container by providing its container ID and confirming the action.
Instructions
[DANGEROUS] Restart a Docker container
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| containerId | Yes | ||
| confirm | Yes |
Restart a Docker container by providing its container ID and confirming the action.
[DANGEROUS] Restart a Docker container
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| containerId | Yes | ||
| confirm | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The [DANGEROUS] label warns of destructive behavior, but no further details are provided about side effects, permissions, or what happens during restart. With no annotations, the description should carry more behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While very short, the description is under-specified and lacks essential information, which is not true conciseness. It fails to be helpful despite its brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations, and no parameter details. The description only provides a danger warning, leaving the agent with insufficient information to use the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0% description coverage for parameters, and the tool description adds no information about 'containerId' or 'confirm'. Parameters remain completely unexplained.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Restart a Docker container' with a verb and resource. The action 'restart' is distinct from sibling tools like start and stop, though no explicit differentiation is provided.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as docker_container_start or docker_container_stop. The description lacks context for appropriate usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/skyvanguard/infra-ops-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server