Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to M3 Memory

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local-first AI memory layer with hybrid retrieval and brain-inspired namespaces. Enables agents to save, search, and manage memories directly via MCP tools.
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Local-first persistent memory for AI agents via MCP, enabling semantic search and memory sharing across agents with zero cloud cost and full privacy.
      12 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Embedded memory and retrieval engine for AI agents, providing local-first memory with MCP support for multi-agent access control.
      3
      22 PyPI
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local-first memory layer for AI agents. Compresses context with a local LLM and serves hybrid search over MCP.
      521 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first persistent memory for coding agents and MCP clients. It keeps important project context across sessions and reduces wasted tokens by retrieving only relevant memories instead of replaying unnecessary history.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides persistent memory for AI coding agents via MCP, enabling agents to store and semantically recall facts, events, and lessons across sessions, all running locally without cloud dependencies.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several meta-tools (tools_list_domains, m3_help_capabilities, m3_index, tools_load_domain, and m3_call) all occupy the discovery/loading/calling space, making their boundaries unclear at a glance. While the core memory/chatlog/files tools are mostly distinct, an agent could easily pick the wrong meta-tool for a given task.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The vast majority of tools follow a consistent `{domain}_{action}` snake_case pattern, e.g. memory_get, chatlog_write, files_search, task_list. The m3_* and tools_* meta-tools deviate slightly but still use lowercase underscore naming and are readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 20 tools, the set sits in the 16-25 range that feels heavy, especially with five meta-tools that could be consolidated. However, the multi-domain scope (memory, chatlog, files, agents, tasks, admin, etc.) provides some justification for the count.

    Completeness4/5

    Core memory workflows are well covered with get, search, write, and supersede, and chatlog/files have solid read/search/status surfaces. Minor gaps remain, such as no direct memory_delete or explicit entity/conversation/admin tools, though the m3_index/m3_call meta-layer can reach those catalog tools if needed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive