M3 Memory
Related Servers
Alternatives to M3 Memory
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLocal-first AI memory layer with hybrid retrieval and brain-inspired namespaces. Enables agents to save, search, and manage memories directly via MCP tools.3 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceLocal-first persistent memory for AI agents via MCP, enabling semantic search and memory sharing across agents with zero cloud cost and full privacy.12 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEmbedded memory and retrieval engine for AI agents, providing local-first memory with MCP support for multi-agent access control.322 PyPI2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLocal-first memory layer for AI agents. Compresses context with a local LLM and serves hybrid search over MCP.521 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceLocal-first persistent memory for coding agents and MCP clients. It keeps important project context across sessions and reduces wasted tokens by retrieving only relevant memories instead of replaying unnecessary history.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides persistent memory for AI coding agents via MCP, enabling agents to store and semantically recall facts, events, and lessons across sessions, all running locally without cloud dependencies.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 20 tools
Several meta-tools (tools_list_domains, m3_help_capabilities, m3_index, tools_load_domain, and m3_call) all occupy the discovery/loading/calling space, making their boundaries unclear at a glance. While the core memory/chatlog/files tools are mostly distinct, an agent could easily pick the wrong meta-tool for a given task.
The vast majority of tools follow a consistent `{domain}_{action}` snake_case pattern, e.g. memory_get, chatlog_write, files_search, task_list. The m3_* and tools_* meta-tools deviate slightly but still use lowercase underscore naming and are readable.
At 20 tools, the set sits in the 16-25 range that feels heavy, especially with five meta-tools that could be consolidated. However, the multi-domain scope (memory, chatlog, files, agents, tasks, admin, etc.) provides some justification for the count.
Core memory workflows are well covered with get, search, write, and supersede, and chatlog/files have solid read/search/status surfaces. Minor gaps remain, such as no direct memory_delete or explicit entity/conversation/admin tools, though the m3_index/m3_call meta-layer can reach those catalog tools if needed.