create_question_option
Add a new option to an existing question in your WordPress feedback questionnaire.
Instructions
Add an option to a question.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Add a new option to an existing question in your WordPress feedback questionnaire.
Add an option to a question.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action without mentioning side effects, idempotency, or required context like which question the option is added to.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short, which is concise, but it lacks structure and critical details. It is minimally acceptable but incomplete.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description fails to provide necessary context about how to use the tool effectively. It does not mention how to identify the question or define the option.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema is empty with additionalProperties true, so the description must compensate by explaining what parameters are needed. It does not, leaving the agent without guidance on how to specify the option content or target question.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Add' and resource 'option to a question', making the purpose unambiguous. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like 'create_question' or 'update_question_option'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For instance, when to add a new option instead of updating an existing one is not addressed.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/skippedaga/yanifend-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server