Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to yanifend-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Public MCP server for agent-created, human-friendly, short-lived surveys. Enables agents to ask structured questions and retrieve answers.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for FormsList, a form-backend SaaS. Enables creating form endpoints, reading submissions, configuring auto-responses, and generating embed snippets via natural language.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for Dashform (getaiform.com) - create and manage AI-powered forms, quizzes, and surveys. Supports form creation, response collection, analytics, and AI-driven form building with 15 tools across form management, response handling, and AI operations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Open Feedback, enabling AI assistants to submit, list, get, update status of, and analyze product feedback via a local HTTP API and JSONL storage.
      346 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for WordPress content management via REST API, supporting posts, pages, media, comments, and terms through natural language interfaces like Cursor, ChatGPT, Codex, and Claude.
      12 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool targets a distinct resource and action: questions, options, answers, and personages are all clearly separated without overlap.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case, such as create_question, list_answers, update_question_option.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 10 tools, the server covers the full lifecycle of questionnaire management without superfluous or missing tools.

    Completeness4/5

    CRUD for questions and options is complete, and listing answers and personages is provided. Minor gap: no tool to create or submit answers, but the set focuses on admin management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues