tv-mcp
# tv-mcp
**Build, deploy, and debug Smart TV web apps from any AI agent.**
`tv-mcp` is a [Model Context Protocol](https://modelcontextprotocol.io) server that gives MCP clients (Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, ...) hands-on access to real Samsung **Tizen** and LG **webOS** televisions: package and sign apps, install them on test TVs, take screenshots, read the JS console, evaluate code in the running app, and press remote-control keys.
The goal: an agent loop of *edit code → build → install → screenshot → read console → fix* that runs hands-free on physical TVs.
## Who this is for
Smart TV development has the worst inner loop in web development: two vendor SDKs, certificate ceremonies, dev-mode timers, and a screen on the other side of the room. This hits hardest in **hospitality and B2B TV** — hotel IPTV, cruise ships, hospitals, digital signage, sports bars — where teams ship one web app to fleets of mixed Samsung/LG panels.
If that's you, this project is for you.
## How it works
Your TV app is a web app in a native wrapper (`.wgt` / `.ipk`). Both platforms expose the webview's **Chrome DevTools Protocol** remote inspector. So `tv-mcp` splits into:
- a **platform plane** per vendor (build/sign/install/launch via `tizen`/`sdb` and `ares-*` CLIs), and
- a shared **CDP plane** (screenshot, console, JS eval) that works identically on both — because underneath it's just Chromium.
```
MCP client ── stdio ── tv-mcp
├── TizenDriver → tizen / sdb → Samsung TV
├── WebOSDriver → ares-* → LG TV
└── CdpBridge → DevTools Protocol → the app's webview (both)
```
## Progressive disclosure
A fresh session exposes only **3 tools** (`list_devices`, `connect_device`, `docs`). Connecting a device unlocks the app-lifecycle tier; launching with `debug: true` unlocks the inspector tier (`screenshot`, `console_logs`, `eval_js`). Deep platform knowledge (Tizen signing/DUIDs, webOS dev-mode expiry, pairing flows) ships as MCP resources fetched on demand — your agent's context stays small until it actually needs the detail.
| Tier | Unlocked by | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | always | `list_devices`, `connect_device`, `docs`, `doctor` |
| 1 | device connected | `build_app`, `install_app`, `launch_app`, `stop_app`, `uninstall_app`, `device_logs`, `remote_key` |
| 2 | debug launch | `screenshot`, `console_logs`, `eval_js` |
## Prerequisites
tv-mcp orchestrates the vendor toolchains — it does not replace them. You need:
| | Samsung (Tizen) | LG (webOS) |
|---|---|---|
| **On this machine** | Node ≥ 20 · [Tizen Studio CLI](https://developer.tizen.org/development/tizen-studio/download) (`tizen`, `sdb` on PATH) | Node ≥ 20 · webOS TV CLI: `npm i -g @webos-tools/cli` (`ares-*` on PATH) |
| **On the TV, once** | Developer mode: Apps → type `1 2 3 4 5` → ON → set **Host PC IP** to this machine's address **on the TV's subnet** → reboot the TV | Developer Mode app from LG Content Store (needs an LG developer account) → Dev Mode ON → note the on-screen passphrase |
| **Signing** | Certificate profile in Tizen Studio's certificate manager. Real TVs reject the generic Tizen distributor cert — you need a **Samsung-issued** cert that includes the TV's DUID (`sdb shell 0 getduid`) | none (dev installs ride the Dev Mode session) |
| **Network** | TV and this machine on the same subnet; port 26101 open only while dev mode is armed | same subnet; SSH on 9922 via the Dev Mode app; sessions expire after ~50h |
Common trap (learned on real hardware): a multi-homed machine has several IPs — the Host PC IP on the TV must be the one on the **TV's** subnet, or the TV silently drops every connection. `docs` topic `device-setup` has the full checklist; the server's errors point there when connect/install fails.
Not sure your setup is right? Ask the agent to run **`doctor`** — one pass over toolchains, signing profiles (it distinguishes Samsung-issued certs from the generic SDK cert that real TVs reject), and TV reachability, with a remedy for every failing item.
## Quick start
```bash
npm install
npm run build
cp devices.example.yaml devices.yaml # edit for your TVs and project
```
Claude Code:
```bash
claude mcp add tv -- node /path/to/tv-mcp/dist/index.js --config /path/to/devices.yaml
```
Then, in a session:
> connect to lab-samsung-q80, build the xtv project for tizen, install and launch it in debug mode, and screenshot it
## Status
Early. Honest capability matrix:
| Capability | Tizen | webOS |
|---|---|---|
| discover / connect | ✅ | ✅ |
| package (+sign) | ✅ | ✅ |
| install / launch / stop | ✅ | ✅ |
| debug attach (CDP) | ✅ | ✅ |
| screenshot / console / eval | ✅ | ✅ |
| remote key injection | ✅ (one-time on-screen pairing) | ✅ (one-time on-screen pairing) |
| dev-mode auto-renew | n/a | 🚧 planned |
| emulator / simulator targets | 🚧 | 🚧 |
| commercial panels (Pro:Centric, SSSP) | 🚧 | 🚧 |
## Roadmap
- v0.2 — ✅ remote-key pairing (Samsung remote WS API, LG SSAP)
- v0.2.x — webOS dev-mode auto-renew
- v0.3 — Android TV driver ([#1](https://github.com/skdonthi/tv-mcp/issues/1)): adb platform plane + the same CDP debug plane (Android TV webapps are Chromium WebViews too)
- v0.3 — Tizen emulator + webOS simulator targets, CI-friendly headless mode
- v0.4 — streamable-HTTP transport + device locking: one shared TV lab, whole team's agents
- v1.0 — commercial hospitality panels (LG Pro:Centric / webOS Signage, Samsung SSSP / HTV)
## Sponsoring
Commercial-panel support (Pro:Centric, SSSP) needs hardware and vendor-portal access that individual maintainers don't have. If your company ships hospitality TV apps and wants this to exist, sponsorship or hardware loans move the roadmap directly — see [FUNDING](.github/FUNDING.yml) or open a discussion.
## Contributing
PRs welcome — see [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md). The `TVDriver` interface in [src/types.ts](src/types.ts) is the extension point; a Vizio/Roku/Android TV driver would slot right in.
## License
[MIT](LICENSE)
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: discover devices, connect to a device, and access documentation. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these three tools.
list_devices and connect_device follow a verb_noun pattern, but docs breaks the pattern by using a noun alone without a verb prefix like get_docs or list_topics.
With only 3 tools and all descriptions mentioning that connecting 'unlocks app lifecycle tools', the server appears to gate functionality behind an initial connection step rather than exposing it directly. The set feels thin for a TV control server that presumably supports app lifecycle, pairing, and packaging operations that are only referenced in the docs tool.
The tool surface only covers discovery, connection, and documentation. Descriptions reference 'app lifecycle tools', 'pairing', 'dev mode', and 'packaging' as capabilities, but no tools exist to actually perform these operations—only docs describing them. This is a severely incomplete surface for the implied domain.