magg_load_kit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It says 'load a kit and its servers' but does not explain what loading entails (e.g., whether it overwrites existing config, requires permissions, or consequences of loading an already loaded kit).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that directly states what the tool does. No unnecessary words; it is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter) and the presence of an output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks details about the loading process, such as whether it is additive or destructive, and what happens to existing configurations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides a clear description for the single parameter ('Kit name to load (filename without .json)'). The tool description adds the phrase 'and its servers' but this refers to the effect of the tool, not the parameter. With 100% schema coverage, the description adds minimal extra value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (load), the resource (a kit and its servers), and the destination (configuration). It distinguishes from siblings like magg_unload_kit (unloads) and magg_kit_info (information only).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., magg_list_kits to find kit names, magg_reload_config after loading). No prerequisites or context for loading are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.