Skip to main content
Glama
siqiliu-tsinghua

mma-mcp

by siqiliu-tsinghua
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mma-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Mathematics

      SHSharkar
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that turns any AI assistant into a powerful mathematical computation engine, providing 52 advanced functions, 158 unit conversions, financial calculations, and secure AST-based evaluation.
      18
      16
      MIT

    • mcp-calculator

      bangbang93
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that integrates the MathJS library to provide AI models with advanced calculation capabilities, including support for complex numbers, matrices, and unit conversions. It supports both stdio and HTTP transports for seamless integration with clients like Claude Desktop and GitHub Copilot.
      1
      39 npm
      MIT

    • codecalc

      The-40-Thieves
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that lets AI models run code in 31 languages, evaluate symbolic math and logic problems, and measure complexity—exposed as 48 tools for execution, session management, translation, optimization, and more.
      2
      49
      232 PyPI
      3
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-calculator

      polatsabuncu5-lgtm
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables mathematical calculations and demonstrates extending AI capabilities through tool integration.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: evaluate returns text output in various formats, while evaluate_image returns PNG images for visual output. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them, as each targets a different output type for Wolfram Language expressions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'evaluate' as the verb and descriptive suffixes ('_image') to differentiate them. The naming is predictable and aligned, making it easy to understand their relationship and functionality.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, this server feels too thin for its apparent scope of evaluating Wolfram Language expressions. It covers text and image output but lacks other essential operations like querying Wolfram Alpha, handling errors, or managing sessions, which limits its utility in broader workflows.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for a Wolfram Language server. It only provides evaluation with text or image output, missing critical functionality such as data import/export, symbolic computation queries, step-by-step solutions, or integration with Wolfram Cloud services, leading to significant gaps in agent capabilities.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources