Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to SINT Protocol

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for LocalStack that enables management of local AWS development environments, including container lifecycle operations, infrastructure deployments, log analysis with IAM policy generation, chaos injection, and Cloud Pods state management.
    7
    206 npm
    27
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Provides per-Subagent MCP controls to any coding agent or client across all your MCPs and prevents context window waste. Loads only 3 tools instead of all your MCP Server's tool definitions. Agents discover tools on-demand, only when needed and only the servers and tools they are allowed.
    4
    46 PyPI
    41
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides a comprehensive interface to Semgrep, enabling users to scan code for security vulnerabilities, create custom rules, and analyze scan results through the Model Context Protocol.
    6
    688
    MIT

Related Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    MCP server that provides a security gateway for AI agents, enforcing allow/confirm/deny policies on tool calls and requiring human approval for risky operations, with full audit logging.
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Provides a security governance layer for AI agents to safely access upstream MCP servers, enforcing tool-level RBAC, parameter constraints, authentication via static tokens or OIDC, and tamper-evident audit logging.
    2
    1
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Sits in front of any MCP server to enforce allow/ask/block policies on tool calls, paths, shell commands, and network domains, with local approval prompts and an audit log.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A least-privilege enforcement proxy for MCP servers. It sits between MCP clients and upstream servers, enforcing tool policies, hiding denied tools, requiring human approval for risky actions, and providing a structured audit trail.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides a governance layer for MCP servers, enforcing policy-based allow/deny/approval rules, requiring human approval for risky calls, and recording an auditable trail of every AI agent tool call.
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Provides a secure MCP boundary for AI agents, intercepting and validating tool calls, redacting secrets, and requiring human approval for sensitive actions with a tamper-evident audit trail.
    -

TDQS

A3.7/5.0

Scored across 21 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no ambiguity. Tools like sint__approve and sint__deny handle opposite actions, sint__audit and sint__pending cover different review aspects, and sint__store_memory and sint__recall_memory manage separate memory operations. The descriptions make each tool's unique role immediately apparent.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent 'sint__verb_noun' pattern throughout, with clear and descriptive names like sint__add_server, sint__remove_server, and sint__list_delegations. The naming convention is uniform, using snake_case and prefixed verbs that accurately reflect each tool's function without deviation.

Tool Count4/5

With 21 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for the server's purpose of managing MCP servers, operator interfaces, and security capabilities. It covers a broad scope including server management, delegation, approval workflows, and memory operations, though it could be streamlined without losing essential functionality.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides comprehensive coverage for the SINT Protocol domain, including full lifecycle management for servers (add, remove, list), delegation (issue, list, revoke), approval workflows (pending, approve, deny), memory operations (store, recall), and operator interface control. No obvious gaps exist; agents can perform all expected operations without dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessWithin a week