A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceMCP server that bridges ChatGPT Plus/Pro to Claude Code, enabling chat, deep research, and image generation via your own account.
47
MIT
mcp-glm-kimi-ollama
by sinner12123
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-glm-kimi-ollama
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA universal MCP server for spawning agents with any OpenAI-compatible LLM, supporting cloud and local models, and integrating with Claude Code, OpenCode, and Codex CLI.MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server that provides a unified interface to various LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, Groq, DeepSeek, and Ollama.6739-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for running external coding agents as background tasks inside Claude Code. Supports multiple backends including Codex, Grok, GLM, DeepSeek, and more.7MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that lets Claude Code offload simple tasks like code explanation, writing tests, and adding comments to a local Ollama model, saving Claude API tokens.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server bridging Claude Code to local llama.cpp. Run local LLMs alongside Claude for experimentation, testing, and cost-effective inference.1913 npm1MIT
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 14 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools target distinct actions (read, write, edit, search, shell, web, media). The AI tools (think, research, agent) have some overlap in reasoning, but their descriptions clearly differentiate: think for step-by-step reasoning, research for codebase analysis, agent for autonomous multi-step execution. One or two pairs (think/research) could be confused if an agent isn't careful.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools share a 'kimi_' prefix, providing a strong sense of consistency. However, while many follow verb_noun (read_file, write_file, fetch_url), others are single nouns (glob, grep, shell, agent). This mix of verb and noun forms is a minor inconsistency, though the overall pattern remains readable.
Tool Count5/5
With 14 tools, the server is well within the ideal 3-15 range. Each tool serves a distinct function from file operations to shell, web, media, and AI reasoning, so the count feels appropriately scoped without being overwhelming.
Completeness5/5
The toolset covers a broad range of operations: file read/write/edit/search, shell execution, web search/fetch, media analysis, and AI-based reasoning/review/testing/agentic tasks. There are no obvious dead ends; for example, file deletion can be handled via shell. The surface is comprehensive for a general-purpose assistant.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues