io.github.simonmak-ascent/fair-value
Related Servers
Alternatives to io.github.simonmak-ascent/fair-value
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables reverse DCF/FCFF valuations, solving for required margins, growth, or reinvestment to achieve a target enterprise value, with forward DCF, consistency validation, feasibility grids, and automated evals.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceStandardized DCF valuation engine for stocks (A-shares, Hong Kong, US, Japan). One run_dcf tool with an analyst-style two-phase flow: baseline valuation from 5-year historicals, then a final valuation with reasoned assumptions — value bridge, sensitivity matrix, reverse DCF. Deterministic: same inputs, same result.1AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenance14 tools for intangible asset valuation: time value, discount rates, cost/market/income approaches, relief from royalty, MPEEM, IP, technology, customer and workforce assets, purchase price allocation, impairment, royalty analysis, Monte Carlo and decision trees. 124+ textbook formulas.2414MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides quantitative analytics and statistical inference for financial data, including Monte Carlo DCF valuation, risk metrics, and trend regression diagnostics, enabling natural language-driven financial analysis via Claude Desktop.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides professional-grade financial analysis tools for Thai stock markets, including PE Band Analysis, DDM, DCF valuation models, real-time SET Watch API data, complete financial statements, and historical ratio analysis with investment recommendations.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to perform multi-stage residual income projections, discounting, and enterprise value bridging analysis using standardized financial data inputs.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 35 tools
The eight native tools (valuation_dcf, valuation_nav, valuation_cca, calculate_wacc, calculate_ecl, black_scholes_price, review_report, get_valuation_summary) are clearly distinct, but the ~27 delegated tools share template-identical descriptions differing only in name. An agent cannot reliably tell valuation_saas from valuation_marketplace, valuation_fintech, or valuation_capm, causing frequent misselection.
Nearly all tools use a consistent snake_case convention with a dominant 'valuation_' prefix, plus calculate_*, black_scholes_price, review_report, and get_valuation_summary. The pattern is predictable and readable despite a few verbless names. Consistency of style is good even though names alone do not disambiguate purpose.
35 tools far exceeds a reasonable scope for a valuation server, and the bulk are near-duplicate delegated endpoints. This is heavy and redundant rather than a well-earned surface. A much smaller set of distinct valuation methods would serve better.
Core valuation workflows are covered (DCF, NAV, CCA, WACC, ECL, options, report review, market data), which is solid for a read-only compute server. However, the delegated tools are opaque about their actual operations, so it is unclear whether the claimed corporate/startup/intangible coverage is real or just an error-envelope stub, leaving meaningful gaps in the effective surface.