A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceModular MCP server providing text preprocessing and NLP tools for AI agent ecosystems.
18 PyPI
MIT
estonian-mcp
by silly-geese
Related Servers
Alternatives to estonian-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for working with the Võro language: local dictionary and corpus lookup, GiellaLT-backed analysis/spellcheck/grammar tools, and Neurotõlge translation.1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceThis MCP server enables grammar and style checking of text using LanguageTool, providing a tool to check text and receive suggestions for issues.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that bridges AI agents with external tools, APIs, databases, and services, enabling standardized tool execution and resource access.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA custom MCP server providing tools for date/time, calculations, mock weather, and note management, enabling AI agents to perform these tasks via natural language.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server providing tools for speech-to-text, translation, language detection, question answering, and text-to-speech using Sarvam AI models, enabling multilingual voice agents.-
TDQS
A4.2/5.0
Scored across 26 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Every tool targets a distinct linguistic function, and even the large check_* family is cleanly separated by text type and specific rule (compounds, punctuation, hyphenation, capitalization, object case, legalese, officialese, style, register). The descriptions explicitly call out sibling tools and their boundaries, so an agent should not confuse them.
Naming Consistency4/5
The check_* prefix is used consistently for quality heuristics, and most core NLP tools follow a readable verb_noun or single-verb pattern. Minor deviations like spell_check, named_entities, and common_legal_usage break the strict pattern, but the naming is still predictable and mostly uniform.
Tool Count4/5
26 tools is above the typical 3-15 MCP-server band, but the breadth of the Estonian language domain—morphology, orthography, style, legal text, and register—justifies most of them. A few tools could be consolidated, but none feel like padding for the stated purpose.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers analysis, generation, spelling, orthography, style, register, and legal language comprehensively, with no obvious dead ends. It is not a perfect 5 because several tools are explicitly phase-1 heuristics (e.g. partial compound, punctuation, and object-case coverage), so some corrections require workarounds rather than authoritative full-language checking.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week