Skip to main content
Glama
signal8ai

Signal8 MCP Server

Official

Get Institutional Holders

get_institutions
Read-only

Retrieve institutional holders from SEC 13F filings for a stock ticker, showing shares held, portfolio weight, and filing dates to analyze ownership concentration.

Instructions

Get institutional holders (13F filers) for a company. Returns institutions that hold positions in this stock based on SEC 13F filings, including shares held, portfolio weight, and filing dates. Useful for understanding institutional ownership concentration.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum results to return (default: 20, max: 100)
offsetNoOffset for pagination (default: 0)
tickerYesStock ticker symbol (e.g., AAPL, TSLA)

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the description correctly adds context about the data source (SEC 13F filings) and returned fields (shares held, portfolio weight, filing dates). No contradictions noted.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no extraneous text. Purpose, data source, and output fields are front-loaded, making it efficient for an agent to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the tool's purpose, data source, and key output fields. Given the presence of an output schema (not shown but referenced in context), it does not need to detail return values. Ample context for a read-only data retrieval tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with full descriptions for each parameter. The description adds value by listing the output fields (shares held, etc.) but does not elaborate on parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 maintained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'get', the resource 'institutional holders (13F filers)', and the scope 'for a company'. It distinguishes from sibling tools that focus on specific institutions (e.g., get_institution_detail) by specifying company-level query.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for understanding institutional ownership concentration but does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor does it mention when not to use it. No alternative tool names are referenced.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools