烟测检查

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must compensate. It mentions the sequence of API calls but lacks details on side effects (e.g., writes, rate limits), error handling, authentication requirements, or what happens if a step fails. This is insufficient behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that efficiently conveys the purpose and sequence. No extraneous words, perfectly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having no parameters or output schema, the description does not explain the return value or how to interpret results. For a smoke check, the agent needs to know if it returns a success/failure flag, a report, or something else. This gap makes it incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter info, which is acceptable. Baseline for zero params is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool performs a minimal smoke test on the Sailfox API, listing the specific sequence of endpoints (online products, orders, sales data, reviews). This is a specific verb-resource pair that distinguishes it from sibling tools which are individual data retrieval operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for smoke testing but does not explicitly state when to use or not use this tool, nor does it mention alternatives. Given the sibling list, it's clear this is for quick health checks, but no explicit guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.