sellfox_ads_sp_negative_products

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, permissions, or rate limits. The description fails to inform the agent about the tool's impact, especially since it's likely a read operation but not stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise but under-informative. It is a single sentence, which is structurally simple, but lacks critical information about the tool's purpose and usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, no annotations, and a minimal description, the tool lacks context on return values, scope, and prerequisites. The description does not compensate for these gaps, making it incomplete for an agent to fully understand usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add any parameter-specific information beyond the schema, but the schema itself is sufficient for parameter meaning given the high coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'SP否定商品基础数据' is vague and does not explicitly state an action verb. It implies it provides basic data for SP negative products, but it is unclear whether it lists, retrieves, or manages. Distinguishes from siblings via 'SP' prefix but lacks specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool relative to siblings like 'sellfox_ads_sp_negative_keywords' or 'sellfox_ads_sb_negative_products'. No conditions or alternatives mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.