Mail MCP Tool
Related Servers
Alternatives to Mail MCP Tool
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI models to read, search, and send emails via IMAP and SMTP protocols. It supports various providers like Gmail and Outlook, allowing for tasks such as retrieving unread messages, searching by sender, and managing mailbox folders.-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes IMAP operations as tools for AI assistants, enabling email management including listing mailboxes, reading, searching, moving, flagging emails, and creating drafts.723 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP service that enables AI to fully manage email accounts, supporting sending emails with attachments and multiple recipients across various email providers.71,579 npm74MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI models to send, receive, search, and manage emails via SMTP/IMAP, including support for attachments, contacts, and advanced search.18-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI to send, read, search, delete and reply to emails through SMTP or Gmail API, supporting common email services like QQ, 163, Gmail and Outlook with HTML/text formats and attachments.24 npm1ISC
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to send, read, and manage emails via SMTP and IMAP, with support for attachments, threads, and mailbox organization.1617 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 17 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes targeting different email operations, but there's some overlap between sendMail, sendSimpleMail, sendHtmlMail, and sendBulkMail that could cause confusion about which to use for basic sending. The marking tools (markAsRead/markAsUnread vs markMultipleAsRead/markMultipleAsUnread) are clearly differentiated by single vs batch operations.
The naming follows a consistent verb-first pattern with camelCase throughout (e.g., deleteEmail, getAttachment, listEmails). Minor deviation exists with 'waitForReply' which uses a different verb style, but overall the convention is predictable and readable.
With 17 tools, the count is slightly high but reasonable for an email management server covering folders, emails, contacts, attachments, and sending operations. It's comprehensive without being overwhelmingly bloated, though some consolidation might improve efficiency.
The toolset covers core email workflows well, including listing, reading, sending, searching, organizing (move/delete), and status management (mark read/unread). Minor gaps include no update/delete for contacts or folders, and no tool for managing email drafts, but agents can work around these with the provided operations.