Get workout template details

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, required permissions, rate limits, or return format. The phrase 'Get full details' is vague; without an output schema, the agent cannot know the structure of the response.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that conveys the purpose efficiently with no extraneous words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimal. It provides enough for an agent to infer the basic action, but lacks completeness regarding the expected response format or any special considerations. Given the complexity and lack of annotations, it is barely adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'workoutTemplateId' is required, but the description adds no meaning beyond 'by workoutTemplateId'. With 0% schema description coverage, the agent relies entirely on the parameter name and the description's implication that it is an identifier. A score of 3 is baseline given the simplicity, but more detail would be helpful.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves full details for a workout template by its ID. It uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('workout template details'), and distinguishes from siblings like 'list_workout_templates' which returns summaries, and 'create_workout_template' which is for creation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It is implicit that one would use this after obtaining a workoutTemplateId from 'list_workout_templates' or 'create_workout_template', but no direct mention of when-not-to-use or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.