Update Booking Page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-destructive and idempotent nature. The description adds value by specifying the effect of setting conferencing_provider to null, which is not covered by annotations, and implies a partial update pattern.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is three sentences front-loaded with the action. No redundant information; every sentence adds value. Efficient and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 16 parameters and low schema coverage, the description is too brief. It lacks explanation of what a booking page is, how updates work (e.g., overwrite vs merge), and how to use other significant parameters like availability_days.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With only 31% schema coverage, the description does not compensate for the missing parameter descriptions. The only added detail is about conferencing_provider null, which is already in the schema. The rest of the parameters remain undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Update' and resource 'booking page', clearly distinguishing from create/get tools. The note about optional fields and specific behavior for conferencing_provider adds further clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states 'All fields optional; provide at least one', which is a usage constraint but does not give explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., create or list). Usage is implied but not elaborated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.