Skip to main content
Glama
shipmail-to

shipmail-mcp

Create Webhook

shipmail_create_webhook
DestructiveIdempotent

Create a webhook endpoint to receive Shipmail event notifications. Returns a signing secret that must be stored securely.

Instructions

Create a webhook endpoint. The signing secret is returned once and will appear in the conversation log; treat the MCP session log as sensitive after this call. Store the secret in the user's chosen secret manager.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYes
eventsYes
descriptionNo
idempotency_keyNoOptional idempotency key. If omitted, the MCP server generates one for POST tools.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
webhookYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses critical behavioral details beyond annotations: the signing secret appears once in logs and must be stored in a secret manager, addressing security concerns that annotations (destructiveHint=true) alone do not cover.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (two sentences), efficiently front-loading the purpose and then adding essential security context without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the output schema exists, the description omits parameter usage and constraints (e.g., URL format, valid events), which are needed for a creation tool with 4 parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With only 25% schema description coverage, the description does not explain the required parameters (url, events) or the optional description, leaving the agent to rely solely on the schema for meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create a webhook endpoint') and resource, effectively distinguishing it from siblings like 'get_webhook' or 'delete_webhook'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., update_webhook, test_webhook), nor does it mention prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/shipmail-to/shipmail-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server