Skip to main content
Glama
sh-patterson

fec-mcp-server

by sh-patterson
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to fec-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • fec-mcp

      bsilha
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that searches official FEC PDF rulebooks for compliance and contribution limits, and provides real-time lookups against the OpenFEC API for candidates, committees, filings, and financial data.
      -

    • statefinance-mcp

      cstillick
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying state-level campaign finance data, including donors, expenditures, committees, and candidates, from multiple state disclosure systems via a unified MCP interface.
      9
      MIT

    • mcp-open-fec

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Access Federal Election Commission campaign finance data through MCP tools. Enables querying OpenFEC data using natural language via ask_pipeworx or direct tool calls.
      7 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct FEC data type or search entity: committee finances vs. compliance flags vs. specific schedules (disbursements, receipts, independent expenditures) vs. searches (candidates, donors, spending). No ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'verb_noun' pattern with lowercase underscore separation: get_*, search_*. No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    8 tools is a well-scoped count for campaign finance research. Covers committee summary, key schedules, and targeted searches without being overwhelming or too thin.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers core CRUD-like operations (retrieve summaries, itemized receipts/disbursements, independent expenditures, compliance flags) and search. Minor gap: no dedicated tool for committee details beyond finances, but searches provide identifiers. Solid for the domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources