submit

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states the action without disclosing side effects like navigation, reload, triggering JavaScript, or what happens if no form is found. Form submission is a mutating behavior that needs more transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with no wasted words. It efficiently conveys the core operation and the parameter's role.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The overall complexity is low and an output schema exists, so return values don't need explaining. However, the description omits critical context such as side effects, when to use it, and behavior on failure, and no annotations fill that gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It does add meaning by indicating the selector is inside the form, which implies it is used to locate the containing form. However, it doesn't clarify selector syntax or constraints beyond this.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Submit') and resource ('a form'), and explains the mechanism ('via a selector inside it'). This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like click, type_text, or evaluate, and indicates the tool will find the containing form for a selector and submit it.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as clicking the submit button or pressing Enter. The description implies use for form submission but provides no exclusions or routing context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.