Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to SeleniumBase MCP

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients like Claude Desktop and Claude Code to drive a real browser with SeleniumBase automation. Offers three variants: WebDriver-based general automation, Pure CDP Mode for bot-detection bypass, and a broad SB() API with MFA and downloads.
    8
    24
    202 PyPI
    10
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Stealth browser automation for AI agents, using source-patched Chromium to bypass bot detection systems like Cloudflare, reCAPTCHA, and FingerprintJS.
    28
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides browser automation with enhanced anti-detection using undetected-chromedriver, enabling robust web scraping and interaction with sites that employ bot protection measures. It is fully compatible with server-puppeteer and includes network traffic monitoring capabilities.
    1
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables browser automation with anti-detection features, including navigation, interaction, form filling, and session management.
    22
    44 PyPI
    10
    MIT

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Scored across 24 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a clearly distinct browser automation concern, and the condition-related tools (check_if_condition, wait_for_condition, assert_condition) are explicitly differentiated by their semantics. Read-style tools like get_content, find_elements, and get_attributes also have clear boundaries despite touching similar page data.

Naming Consistency4/5

Tool names overwhelmingly follow a consistent snake_case imperative verb_noun pattern, with useful groups like get_*, manage_*, and *_condition. Minor deviations like hover_action and check_if_condition are still readable and do not create real confusion.

Tool Count4/5

At 24 tools, the server is on the heavier side, but the count is justified by the breadth of browser automation: lifecycle, navigation, content extraction, interaction, state checking, tabs, windows, storage, cookies, and JavaScript execution. It is slightly over the ideal compact range but not bloated.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the core browser automation lifecycle well: launch/close, navigation, reading content, interacting with elements, waiting/asserting, managing tabs/windows/cookies/storage, and saving page artifacts. Notable gaps like file upload handling and native alert/dialog interaction are absent but can often be worked around via run_javascript or other primitives.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive