Skip to main content
Glama

startSiteAudit

Analyze a domain’s pages for Open Graph, social media, and SEO metadata quality. Get an AI overview with per-page scores and prioritized recommendations.

Instructions

Start a full site audit for a domain. Audits each page for Open Graph, social media, and SEO metadata quality, then generates an AI-powered overview and per-page scores.

The urls array can be sourced from anywhere — discoverSiteUrls structured output, a codebase route scan (read route files and construct full URLs), a sitemap, or a manually provided list. Calling discoverSiteUrls first is NOT required.

For 'audit all': pass every URL from discoverSiteUrls structured output directly. For 'codebase scan': find routes in the project files (Next.js app/, pages/, React Router config, etc.), prepend the domain, and pass them here. If urls is omitted the backend crawls the domain internally.

Audits are asynchronous and can take several minutes. This tool returns an audit ID immediately — use getSiteAuditStatus to poll progress, then getSiteAuditReport to retrieve the completed report.

Pick the right tool: discoverSiteUrls → Crawl-based page discovery (use when you don't have the codebase) startSiteAudit → Run the audit — accepts URLs from any source getSiteAuditStatus → Poll until COMPLETE getSiteAuditReport → Get the full report previewPageAudit → Instantly audit a single URL without waiting

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlsNoSpecific URLs to audit. Pass the user-selected subset from **discoverSiteUrls**. When omitted, the audit crawls the domain internally.
domainYesThe domain to audit. Include the protocol (e.g. https://example.com).
pagesRequestedNoNumber of pages to audit (1–500). Defaults to the length of the `urls` array if provided, otherwise 10. Your plan's monthly URL quota limits the maximum across all audits.
siteContextTextNoHomepage text from **discoverSiteUrls** structured output (`siteContextText`). Including this enriches the AI-generated overview and top-priority analysis.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
domainYes
statusYesInitial status — always QUEUED on creation
auditIdYesID to pass to getSiteAuditStatus and getSiteAuditReport
pagesRequestedYes
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that audits are asynchronous and can take several minutes, returns an audit ID, and instructs to use getSiteAuditStatus for polling. Also explains behavior when `urls` is omitted (backend crawls). No contradiction with annotations (readOnlyHint=false, etc.).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured and front-loaded with core purpose, then parameter guidance, then async behavior and tool selection. It is somewhat lengthy but every sentence adds value. Minor redundancy in repeating 'audit all' explanation could be trimmed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given complexity (asynchronous, multiple URL sources, polling), and full schema coverage plus output schema existence, the description is complete. It covers all aspects needed for correct tool invocation and result handling.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema coverage is 100%, the description adds significant context: for `urls`, explains sourcing methods; for `domain`, includes protocol requirement; for `pagesRequested`, explains default and plan limits; for `siteContextText`, explains its role in enriching the overview. This goes well beyond schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's action ('start a full site audit') and what it audits (Open Graph, social media, SEO metadata). It distinguishes from sibling tools by listing alternatives and their purposes, such as discoverSiteUrls for crawl-based discovery and getSiteAuditStatus for polling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs. siblings, including a dedicated section 'Pick the right tool'. Explains how the `urls` array can be sourced from discoverSiteUrls, codebase scan, sitemap, or manual list, and that calling discoverSiteUrls first is not required.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/securecoders/opengraph-io-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server