faceit_getOrganizerTournaments

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description discloses the endpoint, parameters, and return type (Tournaments list). It lacks details on pagination behavior, auth needs, or side effects, but as a read-only list operation, basic info is sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the main purpose, followed by usage, endpoint, parameter list, and return type. It is concise with no wasted words, every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description states 'Returns: Tournaments list' but does not detail the structure. Parameters are well explained. It covers the essentials for a list tool with pagination, though additional output details would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but the description thoroughly explains each parameter: organizer_id (path, required), type (with enum values 'past'/'upcoming' and default), offset (minimum 0), and limit (min 1, max 100, default 20). This adds substantial value beyond the raw schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves all tournaments of an organizer. It distinguishes from siblings like faceit_getOrganizerChampionships and faceit_getTournamentsList by specifying 'tournaments of an organizer' with optional type filtering.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use to list tournaments run by a known organizer' and mentions optional filtering to past or upcoming. It does not compare to alternatives but the context is clear given siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.