Skip to main content
Glama
sealablab

Moku MCP Server

by sealablab

release_moku

Disconnect from a Moku device and release ownership to enable handoff between different interfaces like CLI, iPad, or LLM.

Instructions

Disconnect from Moku and release ownership

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • The implementation of the `release_moku` method which disconnects from the Moku device, relinquishes ownership, and clears internal state.
    async def release_moku(self):
        """
        Disconnect from Moku and release ownership.
    
        Returns:
            {
                "status": "disconnected",
                "device": "192.168.1.100"
            }
    
        Implementation: See IMPLEMENTATION_GUIDE.md Section 3.3
        """
        if not self.moku_instance:
            return {
                "status": "not_connected",
                "message": "No active connection to release",
            }
    
        try:
            # Store device info before releasing
            device = self.connected_device
    
            # Release ownership
            self.moku_instance.relinquish_ownership()
    
            # Clear internal state
            self.moku_instance = None
            self.connected_device = None
            self.last_config = None
    
            logger.info(f"Released Moku at {device}")
    
            return {"status": "disconnected", "device": device}
    
        except Exception as e:
            logger.error(f"Failed to release Moku: {e}")
            # Clear state anyway to avoid stuck connections
            self.moku_instance = None
            self.connected_device = None
            self.last_config = None
            return {
                "status": "error",
                "message": "Error releasing device, but cleared internal state",
                "details": str(e),
            }
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the ownership release mechanism, implying exclusive access patterns typical of hardware devices. However, it omits critical behavioral details such as idempotency, whether device operations stop upon disconnection, error conditions if called without an active connection, or side effects on configuration state.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of a single, efficient sentence with zero redundancy. Every phrase earns its place: 'Disconnect' establishes the action, 'Moku' identifies the target, and 'release ownership' specifies the critical resource management outcome.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (zero parameters, no output schema) and lack of annotations, the description covers the basic operation but remains incomplete regarding the connection lifecycle. It should clarify that this is a cleanup operation paired with attach_moku and indicate whether the device remains running or stops after release.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool accepts zero parameters. Per the scoring rules, this establishes a baseline of 4. The description does not need to compensate for parameter documentation, and the empty schema is self-explanatory.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the action ('Disconnect') and resource ('Moku') with the specific outcome ('release ownership'). While it implies the inverse of attach_moku through the verb choice, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool or state that this terminates a connection established by attach_moku.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it indicate that this should be called after operations complete or to clean up resources. There is no mention of prerequisites (e.g., requiring an active connection) or sequencing relative to attach_moku.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/sealablab/moku-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server