Skip to main content
Glama
Drata MCP Server

Drata MCP Server

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
DRATA_API_KEYYesYour Drata API key

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": false
}
prompts
{
  "listChanged": false
}
resources
{
  "subscribe": false,
  "listChanged": false
}
experimental
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
list_controlsB

List ALL compliance controls with optional search.

Args: search: Search term for control name/description only_issues: If True, only show controls with problems (not ready, no owner, no evidence)

Returns: List of controls with their status and details

get_control_detailsA

Get detailed information about a specific control.

Args: control_code: The control code (e.g., "DCF-71", "DCF-12")

Returns: Full control details including linked monitors

list_controls_with_issuesA

Get controls that are NOT OK / have problems / need attention.

Use this tool when user asks for:

  • "controls pas bon" / "bad controls" / "failing controls"

  • "controls with issues" / "problematic controls"

  • "controls that need work" / "controls à corriger"

Returns controls with status: NOT_READY, NO_OWNER, or NEEDS_EVIDENCE.

Returns: Controls with compliance issues and their status

get_monitors_for_controlB

Get all monitors (tests) that affect a specific control.

Args: control_code: The control code (e.g., "DCF-71")

Returns: List of monitors linked to this control

list_monitorsC

List ALL automated monitoring tests.

Args: status: Filter - PASSED, FAILED, NOT_TESTED

Returns: List of monitoring tests with status summary

list_failing_monitorsA

Get all FAILED automated monitoring tests - critical for SOC2.

Returns: List of failing tests that need remediation

get_monitor_detailsB

Get detailed information about a specific monitor/test.

Args: monitor_id: The monitor ID

Returns: Full monitor details including failure reasons and remediation

list_personnelB

List ALL personnel with compliance status.

Args: employment_status: Filter - CURRENT_EMPLOYEE, CURRENT_CONTRACTOR, FORMER_EMPLOYEE, FORMER_CONTRACTOR

Returns: Personnel list with compliance status

list_personnel_with_issuesB

Get personnel with compliance issues (failing devices).

Returns: Personnel with failing device compliance

get_personnel_detailsB

Get detailed personnel compliance information.

Args: personnel_id: Personnel ID

Returns: Full personnel details with compliance checklist

list_policiesB

List all company policies.

Args: limit: Max results

Returns: List of policies with version info

list_pending_policy_acknowledgmentsC

Get policies pending user acknowledgment.

Args: limit: Max results

Returns: List of unacknowledged policy assignments

list_connectionsC

List all integrations/connections and their status.

Args: limit: Max results

Returns: List of connections with sync status

list_vendorsC

List all vendors.

Args: limit: Max results

Returns: List of vendors

list_devicesC

List all registered devices.

Args: limit: Max results

Returns: List of devices with compliance status

list_evidenceA

List ALL evidence in the evidence library.

Returns evidence documents uploaded to Drata for compliance.

Returns: List of evidence with details and versions

list_expiring_evidenceB

List evidence that hasn't been updated recently and may need renewal.

Args: days: Consider evidence stale if not updated in this many days (default 30)

Returns: Evidence that may need to be renewed

list_eventsA

List compliance events from the audit log.

Note: Due to API limitations, events are returned in chronological order (oldest first).

Args: limit: Number of events to return (default 50) category: Filter by category - PERSONNEL, CONTROL, MONITOR, CONNECTION, POLICY, VENDOR

Returns: Events with details

list_assetsB

List all assets in the asset inventory.

Args: asset_type: Filter by type - PHYSICAL, VIRTUAL, CLOUD, DATA, PERSONNEL

Returns: List of assets with details

list_usersB

List all Drata users in your organization.

Returns: List of users with their roles

get_compliance_summaryB

Get overall compliance dashboard summary.

Returns: Aggregated view of compliance status across all areas

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription
daily_compliance_checkStart your day with a compliance status check.
prepare_for_auditPrepare a comprehensive audit readiness report.
investigate_monitorDeep dive into a specific monitor/test failure.

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription
compliance_summary_resourceCurrent compliance status summary.

TDQS

B3.2/5.0

Scored across 21 tools

Disambiguation3/5

Tools are mostly distinct by resource, but list_controls_with_issues and list_failing_monitors duplicate functionality already available via filters on list_controls and list_monitors, creating overlap. Descriptions attempt to guide usage, but an agent may still struggle to choose the right tool for issue-focused queries.

Naming Consistency4/5

Almost all tools follow a snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_* for collections, get_* for details). Minor deviation: get_monitors_for_control uses get_ for a list operation, and some list_* names include qualifiers, but the convention is predictable.

Tool Count3/5

21 tools is at the upper end of reasonable for a compliance platform covering many resource types. However, the count is inflated by redundant issue-specific aliases, making the set feel heavier than necessary.

Completeness3/5

The server covers major compliance entities and includes detail endpoints for controls, monitors, and personnel. Yet many resources (policies, vendors, devices, evidence, assets, users) are list-only, and no mutation tools exist, leaving notable gaps for deeper investigation or remediation workflows.